home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sn.no!not-for-mail
- From: mobergru@oslonett.no (Rune Moberg)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc
- Subject: Re: C++ with Zapp vs. Delphi
- Date: 5 Jan 1996 07:17:08 +0100
- Organization: CD-Player Pro author!
- Message-ID: <lKI7w0JfF61N089yn@oslonett.no>
- References: <4cfor8$qno@picasso.op.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hasle.sn.no
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
- In article <4cfor8$qno@picasso.op.net>,
- root@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
- >Pascal is simpler, but C++ is more powerful/flexible.
- >
- >Is this a fair comparison?
-
- I fail to see how "simpler" means less "powerful/flexible"?
-
- How do you measure it? The time it takes to develop a fairly large
- application?
-
- --
- =\ Q: Where can you get Street Fighting Man, Like A Rolling Stone,
- *=- R.Moberg, Not Fade Away, Shine A Light, Angie ...and... I'm Free?
- =/ A: This and more is on The Rolling Stones' latest CD: Stripped!
-